Friday, January 18, 2019

How to Change Active Network Names on Windows 10


If you have Windows 10 Home, you must edit the Registry to rename a network profile. You can also do it this way if you have Windows 10 Professional or Enterprise and would rather rename your profiles by editing the Registry. (However, if you have Windows Pro or Enterprise, we recommend using the easier Local Security Policy editor method in the next section.)
Here’s our standard warning: The Registry Editor is a powerful system tool, and misusing it can render your Windows system unstable or even inoperable. This is a pretty simple registry hack and you shouldn’t have any problems as long as you follow our instructions. However, if you’ve never worked with the Registry Editor before, consider reading about how to use it before you get started. We also recommend backing up the registry (and your computer!) before making any changes, just in case.

http://forum.zidoo.tv/index.php?members/satya123.29322/

Each of the keys (folders) under Profiles represents one of your network profiles. These have long names, which are the GUIDs (globally unique identifiers) representing the profiles.
Click each key under Profiles and examine the “ProfileName” field to see the profile to which the key corresponds. For example, if you want to rename a network named “Network1,” click each key until you see the one with “Network1” to the right of ProfileName.
Double-click the “ProfileName” value for the network you want to rename.

https://www.mobypicture.com/user/satya123
http://yourmidwestmedia.boardhost.com/viewtopic.php?pid=359323#p359323
http://zod.sourceforge.net/fluxBB/viewtopic.php?pid=213104#p213104
http://www.serbianultras.mojkgb.com/index.php?topic=49124.180
https://www.chordie.com/forum/profile.php?section=identity&id=878615
https://allihoopa.com/satya123



Easy steps to recover deleted photos from Android
You do not necessarily need to root your device to be able to recover photos, music, videos and other files from your smartphone you can use the free tool called Recuva or GetData Recover My Files to recover your deleted files from Android. This is how you use Recuva to recover deleted files from your Android:
Connect your device to your computer.
Start Recuva.
Select your device from the list on the top left and click Scan.
When the scan is complete, select the file, and click Recover.
Recover Via Android Application
Many Android apps recover deleted photos from an android phone as well from android’s internal memory allow you to do this directly from your Android device, but for a full recovery, you need a rooted smartphone. we recommend DiskDigger android app, which allows you to recover deleted photos and files from your internal memory or even on a microSD card.
Posted by at 58 comments:

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Police can’t force you to unlock your phone by iris, face or finger

Police can’t force you to unlock your phone by iris, face or finger


A US judge has ruled that law enforcement does not have the right to force individuals to unlock their mobile devices through either their face or finger, whether or not a warrant is in play.
According to a judge presiding over a case in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, forcing a person to do so violates Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
Protections are already in place to protect against self-incrimination when it comes to passcodes for smartphones and so the judge, Kandis Westmore, has decided that biometric security deserves the same consideration in law.

MORE SECURITY NEWS

As described by Forbes, "all logins are equal" now, no matter whether the means to access a device is achieved by revealing a passcode or using a body part.
This runs counter to how US legal professionals have previously viewed biometrics, including irises, faces, or fingerprints. Body parts for unlocking purposes were previously open season for the police, who were given the right to force a device to be unlocked through these means.
The decision came into being after Westmore reviewed a case relating to Facebook extortion. A victim received a demand for payment over Facebook Messenger on pain of an embarrassing video of them being released, and law enforcement requested a warrant to raid a suspect's property.
As well as obtaining the search warrant, the officers involved planned to force open any mobile device on the premises which was protected through biometric technology, such as Face ID or Touch ID.
In the ruling, the judge says that the government request to do so runs afoul of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments and, therefore, had to be denied.
While there were sufficient grounds to request a search warrant, Westmore said the overall request was "overbroad" and while two suspects were identified, "the request is neither limited to a particular person nor a particular device."
"Furthermore, the government's request to search and seize all digital devices at the subject premises is similarly overbroad," the ruling continues. "The government cannot be permitted to search and seize a mobile phone or other device that is on a non-suspect's person simply because they are present during an otherwise lawful search."
The Fifth Amendment states that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself," and so, arguably, biometrics and passcodes -- the latter of which were once considered "testimonial" -- should be considered the same as information found on mobile devices unlocked through these means could result in a criminal prosecution.
"There are there other ways that the government might access the content that do not trample on the Fifth Amendment," the judge added, citing the possibility of obtaining Facebook messenger data under the Stored Communications Act or through a warrant.
The judge says that "technology is outpacing the law," and this rings true worldwide. For now, at least, US citizens can enjoy a small victory for privacy. It does not mean, however, that the motion to treat biometrics in the same way as passcodes when it comes to forced device unlocking will not be challenged in future cases. 
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)